The Moon Landing Hoax conspiricy theory BUSTED with Dave's original proof.
Dave does something no one else has done before - compare the original Apollo 17 16mm ascent camera footage to the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) photos.
Will footage from 40 years apart match up to confirm the moon landing?
The Last Man On The Moon: http://amzn.to/2h1b6Xc
Audio Book: http://amzn.to/2uySy3X
Book: http://amzn.to/2uV67NB
LunarCognita Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7k28y1FL2TU
Inside & Outside footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlGis35Epvs
NVIDIA moon landing proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9y_AVYMEUs
Lunar Roving Vehicle Handbook: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a16/A16OTM15-42.pdf
Third party evidence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings
Apollo cameras: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_TV_camera
Forum: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/blog/eevblog-1548-moon-landing-hoax-busted/
If you find my videos useful you may consider supporting the EEVblog on Patreon or crypto
http://www.patreon.com/eevblog
BTC: 33BsprBQNBtHuVzVwDmqWkpDjYnCouwASM
ETH: 0x68114e40ff4dcdd384750500501e20acf3875f8c
BCH: 35n9KBPw9T7M3NGzpS3t4nUYEf9HbRmkm4
USDC: 0x68114e40ff4dcdd384750500501e20acf3875f8c
LTC: MJfK57ujxy55su4XicVGQc9wcEJf6mAoXF
00:00 - The Moon Landing HOAX
00:27 - Apollo 17 ascent footage
02:05 - The little known 17mm film footage
03:02 - Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter photos
03:35 - Can we match 40 year old film footage to current LRO photos?
05:47 - Take THAT!
07:51 - Gene Cernan
09:02 - The NVIDIA simulation photo proof
Web Site: http://www.eevblog.com
Other channels:
EEVblog2: http://www.youtube.com/EEVblog2
EEVdiscover: https://www.youtube.com/eevdiscover
T-Shirts: http://teespring.com/stores/eevblog
#moon #conspiracy #busted

Hi Apollo 17 was the last Apollo mission to go to the moon on December 14, 1972. They lifted off for the last time and we haven't been back since and the crew comprised Commander Gene CERN and Command Module pilot Ronald Evans who stayed in orbit and lunar module pilot Harrison Schmidt who was a real scientist. he was a real geologist. They of course had to send a scientist to the Moon before they canceled the program.

So you've no doubt seen this very famous footage of the Apollo 17 Lunar module actually taking off from the surface. And that's the last time we went to the Moon 99 321 Patrick Red Excite. Now in case you're wondering how they actually got that footage from the Lunar surface as it was taking off because clearly there was no one there to get it. Well it, they actually had a full pan tilt camera mounted on the Lunar rover.

You can see that here, it's the gold one there in the front of them and that was a full pan tilt and zoom system and it was actually controlled from the ground hence why its name was the ground command and Television assembly. The Gcta and his them info on it was made by RCA and it was used on Apollo 15, 16, and 17 but basically Apollo 15 and it didn't really work Apollo 16 They actually parked the Lunar rover too close to the Lunar module as it was uh taking off so they didn't get some great footage so they learned from that and Apollo 17 they actually got the famous footage which you saw there and there was actually a controller in Houston actually controlling the camera, timing it perfectly to actually uh, tilt the thing as they lift it off because they knew exactly when they were lifting off. They have to account for the couple of seconds Delay from the Earth to the Moon Etc and they got the shot good on them. So not only could they control that, but it fed back video in real time and this was all done via this uh High Gain antenna.

You can see there that huge antenna mounted on the Rover Now that's all on aside, what I really wanted to show you is that not many people have seen or know about. There was actually a second camera. Now this was actually a 16 millimeter film camera and they filmed a whole bunch of stuff with this and I'll actually Link in all the original 16 millimeter film footage down below. but uh, it was mounted on the Lunar Module Pilots window so we can get a great view as they lift it off.

So here it is again with the 16 millimeter camera synced up and it switches on now and Bingo we get the lift off. Isn't this fantastic? So we've got the pen tilt one from the Lunar Rover on the surface and you can also now see the 16 millimeter camera out of the Lunar Module Windows look fantastic. You can actually we see The Descent stage still left on the surface. But here's the interesting bit which I always look.

You can actually see some dark traces on there which are the Luna Rover tracks um, and the footprints and other things left on the surface. That's when I Remembered the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter It actually took photos in 2009 famously of all the Apollo Landing sites. and you can see the uh, Lunar Buggy tracks and all the equipment Left Behind The Descent stage and everything is the original 2009 image. but they actually re-minched it at a lower altitude in Uh 2011 and you can actually see the difference.
That's 2009, that's 2011. And look, we can see all the traces left behind by the Moon buggy. So I thought wow, wouldn't it be awesome if we could somehow match 40 year old 16 millimeter footage shot from the Lunar Module coming up from the surface against 2011 Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Photos overlay them and see if they match? Hmm, let's find out. So I use the original image from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and the detail is actually quite incredible.

In this, you can actually see all the Uh Luna Rover tracks. look at that crisscrossing around, there's one's further off uh, frame that go out at a further distance and some of the equipment Left Behind including The Descent stage. This is great now. Unfortunately, the original 16 millimeter footage that I saw really didn't seem to have the detail in there.

It was very muddied out and the contrast wasn't there. so I thought I'd at least have to do some contrasting enhancement to try and bring out the Uh Lunarova tracks. I'd also have to do a perspective uh skew most likely do accommodate the differences in the Uh Lunar Module as it was ascending because it didn't Ascend straight up it did at first and then it sort of uh, you know, tilted and headed off at an angle so I might have to correct for that compared to the Lunar Reconnaissance Auburn and do all that sort of stuff. and then I discovered this footage from a YouTube user Luna cognita.

So full credit I'll link in the video down below and what they've done is they've done a perspective correction to align it, rotate it for the Lunar Horizon there. so on the left uh is the is the adjuster one with contrast enhancement and the original raw footage on the right. and look at this. you can start to see on the left there all of the beautiful Luna Rover tracks coming out of there.

so let's overlay the images and see if they match. So I froze the video at a point where I could see this rather distinctive uh dark cross at the top of the image there and then I uh rotated the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter photo and uh sized it appropriately and you can see them side by side. You can see they match pretty darn well, don't they? Amazing! Didn't even have to do any skew perspective correction, but hey, let's do a couple of little more tiny uh tweaks on there and size in an orientation and everything else and overlay them one on top of the other and fade them in and out. Transparent and it's a perfect match.

Bang on. Take that conspiracy theorist 40 years apart from a 16 millimeter footage shot out of the window of the Lunar Module as it was ascending from the surface of Apollo 17 last time we walked on the moon. and then photos from 2011 looking down and they match perfectly. Of course, it's not surprising enough, and of course they match perfectly because we landed on the freaking moon.
It's really there and but I Was actually surprised at the detail we could get out of this. and I didn't really do a huge amount of work here. didn't expect this sort of detail. even some of the faintest tracks in there.

You can actually see them if you spend a while and just detail them. I won't Point them out, but it's it. is absolutely bang on. Incredible.

40 years apart. Of course. If you want to actually prove that we went to the moon to these delusional idiots, then, well. there's dozens of ways to do that.

a laser ranging experiment, and just countless other things. It's just ridiculous. And yeah, as if we faked it nine times. Unbelievable.

Anyway, I didn't set out to create a moon landing uh, debunking video I Just uh, this just occurred to me to try and match these photos. I was curious and see if I could get any detail out of it. and just as an aside, after I actually did this I just found uh, some what possibly could be some better enhanced uh, footage. you know, reconstructed footage of the original 16 millimeter tapes.

This is from the Apollo flight Journal website and you can see we're about to lift off here and you can see the greater detail. you know, perhaps? um, really nice contrast there on the images, but you can see the Lunar Rover tracks and everything else now. Gene Cernan being the commander, was actually the last man to set foot on the moon very famously. Now, just as an aside, I've actually met Gene Cernan and yes, he's a top bloke.

Sadly, it wasn't too long before he, uh, passed away. but I do recommend his book The Last Man on the Moon and I actually recommend the audiobook version narrated by Gene Cernan himself. I've got the original version on cassette. old school street cred.

Anyway, I'll link in that down below if you want it. Highly recommended along with the documentary of the same name, The Last Man On the Moon. Do yourself a favor, check that one out, Trust me. So there you go I Hope you enjoyed that and found found it interesting I'm quite proud of that.

It's my own original proof that we actually landed on the Moon by comparing that Luna and reconnaissance orbit of footage. Absolutely amazing. Anyway, um, there's tons of other third-party evidence uh for landing on the moon. of course you know the laser range finder and there's a whole bunch.

There's actually a Wikipedia page with all the different third-party evidence and I'm glad I uh contributed to that. One of my favorite though. and I'll link this in Um is when this was like eight years ago Nvidia actually uh, simulator with like a 3D model and shade, lighting and everything. The actual uh setup of when that famous photo that Neil Armstrong took of Buzz Aldrin coming down uh, the ladder and there's a lot of people that point to oh it.
It's so lit up that it was lit up with stage lights and everything. but they modeled it and they couldn't quite get the results they wanted. but uh, spoiler alert Um, here it is. Neil Armstrong is the light source we Analyze That video a little more we realized it's Neil Armstrong himself.

The brightness suit that he was wearing is Neil Armstrong all that sunlight off of him and back onto Buzz Aldrin It makes sense when you look at you know the Albedo value which is the amount of light there it is into your eye basically from a surface for the Lunar soil is around like 12. But the the suits. because they're like a Teflon coated material, they're around 80 to 90 percent and so they're very reflective. It's almost like a mirror except you can't see something in the reflection.

It just reflects the light once we pull that information in and actually modeled a second astronaut and the light coming off of him. So there's the original photo. and then when they added in the light source, they got the extra uh reflection when they physically dropped in. Neil Who had the bright suit on that would reflect like 80 plus percent of the light.

Then it lit up the scene and it matched the original uh photo precisely. And that's just absolutely brilliant proof. I Love that. So anyway, there you have it, get more proof.

Totally busted the moon landing things as busted as you ever want to bust. but hey, you know it's good fun to believe right that it never happened And they did Honestly? on stage? Whatever. Just wait until you see the comments down below. This video is just going to get flooded with them anyway.

I Hope you found that interesting and useful If you did give it a big thumbs up. Catch you next time. Foreign.

Avatar photo

By YTB

25 thoughts on “Eevblog 1548 – moon landing hoax busted”
  1. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jueyes says:

    Debunk Sky Scholar and Professor Hourani, Good luck if you actually decide to go down that rabbit hole, I am pretty sure that Sky Scholar is onto something and that indeed the sun is metallic hydrogen and the CMB is not real. It makes sense if you think about it, how on earth could you ever expect to be able to record the supposed aftermath of the big bang through all the other various galactic emissions, they cant and its obvious once you listen to sky scholar why that is. The only thing the cosmologist can do about his videos and his peer-reviewed papers is go on and on about how he is a dr of radiology and not a cosmologist but sometimes it takes a person from outside the field to show people inside it what they are missing, he understood all the laws they were breaking when it came to emissions, and I think he has ORIVEN that at the very least they didnt confirm the CMB and more likely they just recorded the hydrogen bond from Earths Oceans which is why they could never see the actual monopol signal at l2.

  2. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Scott Wallace says:

    It's all CGI. And the Earth is flat.

    Just kidding. Nice work as usual. One amusing claim by Moon landing deniers is that the takeoff video of the Apollo 17 lunar module was faked, because you can see multicolored cartoony sparks. The real story behind the colors is interesting and ingenious: the video camera was black and white, but equipped with a rotating three color filter wheel. This allowed synchronizing the transmission through filters to allow the reconstruction of a color image. But anything moving quickly is likely to only get one of the three colors at any given time, so we get this funny effect.

    cheers from sunny Vienna, Scott

  3. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jon Smith says:

    Where's the part where he 'busts the landing hoax'? All he's done is repeat the fake evidence for the landing. Images, which form the bulk of his presentation, do not serve as proof of claims.

  4. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars GeorgeAethalides says:

    BS

  5. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars retsamyar says:

    there is still russian news sites in 2023 claiming it was faked. Oh and I am not talking about some tabloid but their main state linked news media. of course they only have state linked media anymore ..

  6. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Pat Sullivan says:

    Your heavy accent makes this hard to understand.๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿป Hire a professional narrator with a neutral accent. ๐Ÿ‘

  7. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Robert Roth says:

    I believe they landed on the moon, since it's not really all that far away, by spaceship.

  8. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Florian Hofmann says:

    Would be stronger evidence, if the pictures came from an independent or even opposing source like Russia, India or China.

  9. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars My Modesty says:

    The Earth is flat, and that is that – Hรคgar the Horrible

  10. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jason Ford says:

    Nice rocket flame on take off…and just so you know we didn't have remote control cameras back then…and if this is true elon musk is not the first to land a rocket…

  11. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Paul says:

    The Official Story, the Sheeple would buy
    When met with an obstacle, tell, simply, more lies

  12. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Bards Amok says:

    63% of moon landing conspiracy theorists believe the moon isn't real.

  13. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Alex LaBorde says:

    All images came from same source. With years of doubt , surly they didn't make match ? Like how in bible the new test. was just prophecy fulfillment.

  14. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars MVVblog says:

    While it is undeniable that the Apollo missions were genuine, as long as images and footage are produced by NASA, it's clear that they coincide; they weren't born yesterday.

  15. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jason Ford says:

    This bloke is so full of lies…

  16. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars MoonStudio says:

    con grats you just proved what picture thy used to make the fake… did USSR walk on the moon too? thy have 3 laser finders/reflectors on the moon…

  17. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Krishna Chintalapudi says:

    Paid artist

  18. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars chew ng says:

    if those are really true lunar rover tracks then do you know how wide or huge those tracks would be comparing to the size of the craters! they have to be several tens of meters wide!!

  19. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Sully says:

    And chocolate doesn't come from chocolate Cows….

  20. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Phuk U 9gag says:

    I work at NASA in Clear Lake, Texas from 1990 – 1996. I work in Building 9 (flight simulators). I often interacted with Astronauts by training them on the fix base & motion base systems. I was 23 and just came out of college!! Sometime I jokingly asked that we have powerful TELESCOPE that can see into the the depths of the Galaxyโ€ฆ.it could EASILY put to rest the notion IF we went to the moon or not. Point it at the moon and SHOW US THE FLAG, moon lander, moon rover, etc!!! They never answer!! The entire industry is a TAXPAYERS MONEY WASTING MACHINE!! I left in 1996โ€ฆ.and worked for oil companies instead!! At least it is REAL!! ๐Ÿ˜‚

  21. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Phuk U 9gag says:

    The HUBBLE TELESCOPE can see into the the depths of the Galaxyโ€ฆ.it could EASILY put to rest the notion IF we went to the moon or not. Point it at the moon and SHOW US THE FLAG, moon lander, moon rover, etc!!! They never could ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

  22. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Ivan Delabanque says:

    What happened to the part left behind and the moon buggy..

  23. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars marxman00 says:

    The bit where they have to reverse connect to the LEM, crawl through in suits that dont fit the hatch into an unpressurised cabin ,"drive" to the moon, land ,mess about with not enough air tanks to support life for that long ,then blast off with a now little tiny rocket engine with enough fuel to mysteriously perfectly redock with the orbiting CM traveling at 25000 mph……sounds reasonable

  24. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars ๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ‡บ Hunter Biden's Crackpipe says:

    Moon landing was a hoax

  25. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars jimle22 says:

    I retired with 20 years working at NASA Kennedy Space Center. I have had numerous arguments with friends who claim it was all a hoax. This vindicates my whole reason for working and why I loved my job. Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *