A followup to the previous video on photoflash senstivity on the Raspberry Pi 3 WiFi chipset.
EEVblog Main Web Site: http://www.eevblog.com
The 2nd EEVblog Channel: http://www.youtube.com/EEVblog2
Support the EEVblog through Patreon!
http://www.patreon.com/eevblog
EEVblog Amazon Store (Dave gets a cut):
http://astore.amazon.com/eevblogstore-20
T-Shirts: http://teespring.com/stores/eevblog
๐Ÿ’— Likecoin โ€“ Coins for Likes: https://likecoin.pro/ @eevblog/dil9/hcq3

Hi. This is just going to be a quick follow-up video to my previous one on the Raspberry Pi three photosensitivity issue because quite a few commenters us. and I think rightly so that it might have been caused this lockup issue when you use the photo flash on a camera on the Wi-Fi module here on the back, which is a new issue which wasn't on the Raspberry Pi 2, then it might have been caused by, you know, some people saying like EMP It's basically magnetic coupling from the large amounts of current in the photo flash here onto the board. so it may have been an electrical coupling interference issue rather than photo sensitivity of the bare die on the bottom here.

So that's a fair enough comment because the photo flash on here. There's a charged capacitor inside here, a photo flash capacitor which charges up with a massive amount of energy and then dumps it very very quickly into the photo flash bulb here. and there's wires running up the sides here like this: I Like the capacitors inside the camera and the wires running up here, this means there's a big loop area here. and what this loop area means is that any corresponding loop area on the board, you can get effectively magnetic transformer coupling loosely coupled.

From this into this, you've got a high discharge current very quick that can generate EMF in loops inside here. primarily our power supply loops and other things. Some people might have said the antenna, but the antenna is not actually a loop as such. Anyway, we won't get into the details of that.

I thought yeah, that's a fair enough comment. So let's actually test it now. What I've got is I'm just pinging here to our double eight double eight and you can see that our time there is. you know, 20 odd milliseconds or something like that.

Occasionally it jumps up to 30 or something like that and that's just fine now. I've got some black electrical tape over the Bairdi Wi-Fi chip down here so let's use our flash and see if we can see any variation in that pin time. No, nothing whatsoever. and let's try it a few times just for good measure, just to show that it wasn't luck.

And for reference, I've got this about 10 centimeters away, actually 11 centimeters away from the actual white ship itself. Now, I won't do anything different except physically remove the black electrical tape. So our Bairdi Wi-Fi bluetooth chipset is now exposed exactly the same camera position, all the same settings and bingo, we got the thing to lock up now. Oh there, No it, no there we go.

it actually recovered I was going to say I saw this a couple of times. it did actually cover set went up to 95 milliseconds there and but I had to reshoot this video. by the way because I lost all my data because I don't ask the memory card issue. Oh there we go.

a thousand milliseconds and before I got it straight away but it was actually 10 centimeters away before. so I'll do that. But anyway, that is confirmed. It is a photo flash issue and not I'll put it back there.
we go so we've moved a bit closer. it is. That is definitely confirmed. It is a photo flash issue photo sensitivity issue with the bare die.

the energy particular frequencies is getting through that die and let's try it again. Now see if I can get a complete lock up I have actually had it recover like that that you saw before, but then I have actually had it completely lock up. Hopefully it'll do it this time where it just does not recover at all and it completely times out and we get no more internet and I think maybe it's going to do that this time. So there you go.

that is definitely confirmed. It is not any sort of electrical interference coupling issue and definitely photosensitivity of the die. Absolutely confirmed and will actually start to see some messages There we go. No buffer space available so we're completely locked up.

Our internet didn't recover. It's no good. You have to reboot the board and know it doesn't matter how close I have it here. I've got it like three centimeters away.

now. It's right. it's clacker basically and we can. There we go.

We can flush that thing and it does absolutely nothing with the electrical tape in place. It's completely opaque. We take the electrical tape off and this puppy is going to lock up. a guaranteed Bingo confirmed.

And there were also were several people who wanted me to use the D message command. is it or whatever it's called I don't know I've never used it before with the /w follow option so wait for new messages basically. so let's actually try that Here we go. and I don't know where all that means it's all Wi-Fi chipset Bluetooth data whatever.

Anyway, it's waiting for a response. Oh, just put the tape over that and flash it. We're back at like 11 centimeters distance or anything. nothing and take this off.

and there we go. And we got absolutely nothing out of that whatsoever. Let's go down a bit more so we're close. I So we definitely know that it's going to lock up.

and nope, we didn't get anything out of it. What's the way about sorry and we will see that that is definitely dead. There we go. So of course that's going to be exactly the same issue for the use 16 power supply chip on here.

just like on the Raspberry Pi 2. There was basically no reason to suspect it wasn't Now sorry to anyone who was watch my previous video. seemed to be quite a lot of people bit a bit of an uproar, really got the impression that I was making out that this was a somehow like a really big deal and it's not I Thought that was pretty obvious from the video that you had to have it so close that it's an unrealistic scenario. and that raspberry pie seemed to possibly I don't know, we need confirmation from them maybe purposely tried to fix the you 16 issue by putting that black coating on the top from the roster pi2 because it wasn't really a big deal for the Raspberry Pi - either.
it was kind of one of those nice things that if you use this exposed board and you know for an art installation or something and somebody came up and took a photo flash photo of the thing then yet it might reset and shut down. In any case, it wasn't a big deal back then because the fix was easy and there are the odds of it happening to your average person or borderline zero and but it now has a black coating on it's probably an order of magnitude better ie. less sensitive to that reset issue on that chip as you saw in my previous video. it had to be like, you know, an inch or two away right up its clacker in order to you know for it to reset and be an issue and I thought that was pretty obvious.

Okay, I didn't sorry if you got the impression that I made out that it was a big deal, it definitely isn't I just did it as a for a a follow-up video to the previous one because nobody had tested the Robert Raspberry Pi 3 that I could find anyway to see if this was still a potential issue or not. Regardless of how small the issue is, academically, it is quite interesting and potentially hey, I don't know the output of the flash on this camera. if you had a big speed light thing on your digital SLR or something and you happen to have the bottom of your board exposed like this with the bare Wi-Fi died and you were relying on the Wi-Fi or Bluetooth or whatever and it could remotely be an issue that you might have to take into consideration, but most people will not have to worry about. It's basically a non-issue it's just interesting and I thought it was worthy.

Just do or pointed out to people that you know potentially that issue might exist regardless of how small it is. Anyway, the fix is easy. Black electrical tape, blue tack, some sort of, you know, hope, anything opaque basically and non conductive, some sort of silicone or something. It doesn't matter.

all whack it. In a case, as most people do, it's not a big deal. so sorry if you've got the impression that I was making out that it wasn't Anyway, hope you found that interesting. Definitely confirmed It is a photoelectric issue on that Wi-Fi chip.

Still a small problem and hey, raspberry Pi, don't have to fix it. It's a low-cost non-for-profit board. I'm totally aware of that and you know, no big deal, it's just an interesting video anyway. I Hope you found that conformation interesting and I haven't done extensive tests with exactly how far the Y fiber is saw.

It was interesting that it sort of imposed the Wi-Fi and upset it a little bit and then it actually recovered and got the ping. I Don't know if there's any other issues I Don't know if Bluetooth that fail doing that or whatever, but you know I mean the odds of it being that EMP thing were quite low. I Think because the chip designers, for example, they're gonna like this chip, they would have been basically concerned about any you know, interference to it on the power supply and things like that. That's where they would have concentrated.
But like the million odd transistors in this side side this thing or how many it is and how many and which ones get affected by the photoelectric effect from this flash here at particular frequencies practically impossible to no predict, protect against or something like that. So you know that's just the thing with these bare dies. A lot of people are. Start: Why do they make these packages If they're photosensitive? Well, it applies to all bare dies like this.

And because they're basically chip scale packages, they are really, really incredibly small. And these packages are what make your mobile phone and other ultra miniature products these days possible if you put them in standard epoxy packages and everything, they're bigger. and maybe only a little bit bigger. But all that space, extra space adds up.

so they're You know, That's just the thing with these things. A Bare Die is technically photo sensitive. It's It's nothing new. it's a very well know enough phenomenon.

And that's you know. Usually they go into cases, the mobile phone case or whatever, and they're not exposed to anything, so they're just fine. So there's nothing wrong with these chipset packages. They're not bad design, they're just exposed die.

That's the nature of the beast. Anyway, you found that follow-up video interesting. Catch you next time.

Avatar photo

By YTB

25 thoughts on “Eevblog #901 part 2 – rpi 3 photoflash wifi problem”
  1. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Avixk says:

    I completely agree that it's an extremely small issue, but I would have never known this sort of thing happened without these videos. It might be useful someday and that's what really matters.

  2. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars DasIllu says:

    This is a problem that we encounter every day. Also through pure coincidence i discovered that the raspberry pi 3 is also vulnerable to shotgun slugs. Not only does it freeze, it also won't reboot. This problem has to be fixed… ASAP!

  3. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars radby says:

    If you see a RPi3 board for sale from Dave, don't buy… the WiFi chip was abused ๐Ÿ™‚

  4. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Dave McAnulty says:

    hey dave, how about using a piece of thick glass to block the UV, does it still happen?

  5. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Fred Flintstone says:

    Being the scrutinizing engineer that you are, and your ability to find problems in various designs and products, coupled with the enthusiasm you have with your work is probably why people get the impression that you thought it was a serious matter when it really isn't. Personally I enjoy the high drama you bring to the field even though some of the time it's nits that are being discussed. Sometimes these are very important matters, so let the viewer use some discernment. If people are really concerned about their Raspis, then put a bit of black tape or whatever on the chips.
    I mean no offense to engineers, I am one myself, but the truth is that some engineers can be very anal about certain points when in the big picture of things the points are not significant. Some have a little bit of difficulty assigning the proper weight to a problem. Often it's a matter of Ego. Sometimes we just have to say the design is 'good enough', build it and then move on. This does not mean compromise on important issues, but there is a point where many engineers will end up picking the flyshit out of the pepper (so to speak)…

  6. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars 8-Bit Musicยดs says:

    i like the raspi through.

  7. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars ExStatic Bass says:

    The only thing I've seen that has any issue with light was the old EPROMs that used UV light to erase the memory space. It's really odd that's so sensitive. I realize how intense the light from a camera strobe is. You'd think modern chips wouldn't be so affected as that Pi board though. Weird…

  8. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars james lawrence says:

    if someone had the issue, would whiteout be likely to fix it? i'm just curious.

  9. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars John Hamblett says:

    If it was not a big deal with the 2 why bring the issue up with the 3? Let it lie man. Yes we understand that bare dies are UV sensitive from the (very informative) Pi 2 video. There was no need to revisit this.

  10. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars XPLOREanXPLODE says:

    Very interesting, didn't know about that phenomomenom ๐Ÿ™‚

  11. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars FeedbackLoop says:

    Hi Dave! How do you use that Zoom H1 recorder?

  12. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jilocasin says:

    Hey Dave, I got a question regarding the UV stuff and I hope somebody can clear that up.

    If that chip is the pure die put on the PCB exactly like ti came from the wafer, what's stopping the UV light to further "develop" the die? I'm not into wafer kinda things at all unfortunately, but isn't that how the die was made in the first place? So, could continuous exposure of UV light potentially damage the die then?

  13. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars DeathOfTime says:

    I like the pi 3. it makes a really good and cheap backup computer. I have trouble playing back internet videos with it. It does the rest of the internet stuff well enough though. Really good for when I am running off my battery backup. The monitor drains to much power though. If it wasn't for that I could probably still have internet access for two or so hours without power to the house.

  14. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jacob Peterson says:

    Thank you for making a video on this. I did not realize bare dies were photosensitive (although I should after messing with enough UV Erasable PROMs). Gives me something to go on if experiencing strange stability issues on boards with dies exposed to lights. Certainly not a big design flaw or anything on the RPi as you stated, just something that is good knowledge to have for strange edge cases and working with other electronics.

  15. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Heilman Hackatronics says:

    Thanks for clearing that up.

  16. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars peter adshead says:

    Can you try on take you case of the camera and see if that looks up, with photo flash ?
    meaning who uses a raspberry pi 3 without a case that way around and uses a photo flash ?.

  17. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars A.Z.C. says:

    I was just watching dank memes how the heck did i get to this video

  18. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Jammit Timmaj says:

    Here's a video idea. Test the optical properties of various components, like glass/epoxy diodes, TO3 transistors with the cap removed, etc.

  19. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Knuckles the Echidna says:

    Is the RS components edition (white camera and LCD connector) affected too? Probably is.also the RS components edition I have seems to have silver pins and the Element 14 edition has gold ones.

  20. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Patrick Wall says:

    Cant people take a result as a result? The man did an experiment, got a verifyable result. And got happy. Anyone could , if they wanted, confirm or refute the result by repeating the experiment. That is science and something to get excited about. Do what you do man. Good on you.

  21. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Tom Minnick says:

    Is "clacker" spelled with a C or a K? (Clacker or Klacker)

  22. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Fibro DaD says:

    teardowns, you must have years worth of real good stuff donated dave. come on.

  23. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Ziginox says:

    Is anyone else worried about the durability of a bare die on the bottom of the board?

  24. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars alch3myau says:

    Its a serious issue, What if you have this mounted on a pole and say theres a nuclear blast off in the distance.. Id have to get up there and restart the fucker! …

  25. Avataaar/Circle Created with python_avatars Blowitup1991 says:

    why didn't you just turn the camera flash away from the board instead of the tape over the chip?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *