Hi Yes, it's the life of a video blogger again. Woke up this morning check my email. What do I get another copyright claim on my video in this time, but this time around they've shut down my video completely. It's blocked.

Let's have a look. Hi Eevblog sorry about my voice I Don't know what's going on due to a cop over and above my usual voice. Due to a copyright claim, your YouTube video has been blocked. This means that your video can no longer be played on YouTube Thanks for that Guilty until proven innocent Eevblog number 11 36 Banksy Artwork Shredder Video Part 2 claimed by Canal + Blur may contain copyright contact.

Copyright owners can choose to block YouTube videos that contain their cop content. Now this is the thing. Video creators including myself I haven't enabled this, but any video create especially large corporations on YouTube when they set up the YouTube channel have the option to turn on video Content ID so that every time you upload a YouTube video, then it the Alga algorithm automatically magically Maps Certain searches it and puts it all into the database so that anytime anyone else uploads a video, it gets checked against that magic database. I Don't know how they do it, it's so huge.

Let's just the logistics are doing this. The technical logistics are doing this is so huge I Don't understand how the able to do this but anyway yeah your content can be automatically matched against this database. If it matches then the claimant in this case can now. Plus they they claim that they own the copyright on that video.

They don't have to prove they own the copyright, they can just claim that they own the copyright and then they can either choose to block. In this case, block my video or they can choose to take my effort or still allow the video. But they get all the advertising revenue and this is not the first time this has actually happened to this particular video. It also happened when was this first in November the same video who got claimed.

The exact same video has now been claimed by two different parties. the Banksy Artwork Shredder claimed by Vali Arm Digital Proprietary Limited which is actually an Australian company. They claimed that they owned the copyright content, but I disputed that and and won that. but they didn't block my video.

They chose to just take my advertising revenue and they said apologies for the late response. We were under the impression that the creator on our network owned this content. When it was established that they didn't we release the claim immediately. Apologies.

Ok, fair enough, but you know they should have verified that the owner that the bird. because this is like a large company whom handled some like a management company who handles many different channels. you know they just assume that they own the copyright, etc. Anyway, they did apologize and they release the claim.

And no, they do not get the advertising revenue when a claim like this is put in and the video is not blocked, it's just like the claimant is claiming the advertising revenue for it. YouTube Actually hold that revenue until the dispute is finished and then when the dispute is finished, all the advertising revenue goes to in this case back to me who basically wins the case. So yeah, we've got the same again. And if you go in here, of course, audio-visual content match from 14 minutes to 1443 there.

That's what they claim matches and let me play this. so if it doesn't come through properly, it may not. Anyway, you can play it yourself. Oh I never could.

Oh bloody hell stupid. it's my browser. Something's up with Chrome I Don't know what the deal is. Anyway, here we go.

Just use Opera browser quickly. let's have a look played. Match Here is the match. Sorry if you can't hear that, but it's basically 43 seconds of Me Adam commentary adding value, right? So this is clearly fair.

Use me talking over and commentating over our Banksy's original video. So they're claiming copyright, as did Valium over Banksy's video and it is Actually it's the video is actually comes from here from Banksy's own original channel. Banksy is the one that owns the copyright to this video. not Canal+ or Valium or anyone else or any other news agency that uses this.

And here's the problem. All these news channels and everything else they they use. Banksy's video. Our part of it or whatever.

don't add any value. A lot of them. The previous claim from Valley Arm simply uploaded Banksy's original video and then claimed copyright over it. Unbelievable.

So so what they do is they either upload the whole content that's not theirs and then because their channel is set for automatic Content ID Every video they upload, even if it's not their own work, goes into the copyright claim system and they claim copyright on it and the system just automatically claims copyright. It's completely not a So in this case. I don't like the YouTube feature because it doesn't tell. Okay, it tells me who the claiming is can our plus but it doesn't tell me where the original video is so I can't even view it.

So is that some news story with the video have Canal+ just re uploaded the video or whatever. Anyway, my video they have decided that are there. They don't want my ad revenue. they just want to block my video so make video is currently blocked.

You cannot watch it until I. File a dispute and you're damn right. I Will file a dispute because they do not own the comp content Banksy does and even in that case it is fair use because I'm adding commentary on top of it. It's a technical news analysis video.

I Like Unbelievable. So this is the crap you got to put up with. so who are can now? Plus well, are there some huge French premium? TV Channel launched in 1984. Who cares? They probably some huge conglomerate own a whole ton of stuff I Don't know.

and if you go over their channel I assume that this is their channel they're talking at once again. I Don't know YouTube Don't tell me. They just say Canal+ could be any one of the companies just like Valium. When that valium claim came in, it wasn't Valium as channel who did it.

it was one of their because they're a management company was one of their channels that they were handling. so they handle the blanket copyright claim for all of the channels that they manage is one of those you know, like a multi-channel network thing. So yeah, and of course, and if you search Banksy on there you get zippity-doo-dah So yeah. I Have no idea where this claim is even coming from.

So just from a transparency point of view, this whole copyright claim process is. So let's go into file a dispute. Shall we? Here we go. I Believe this content claim is not valid because there's no option is because the original claimant doesn't own the copyright.

you know it's anyway. So I've got to go through the what Is that? The fair use? It's not. It's not my original content, so it does. Actually, my video does claim fair use.

legal requirements for fair use of fair dealings under the copyright law. Bingo! I don't have permission from Banksy the company? Yep, that'll do fair use. I am sure and you only get like a limited number characters to explain yourself to like you can't give a a full detail I Can't believe it and I can't remember how many a characters is, but it's not many. You can only put it like a sentence or two tops anyway.

so I'll fill in that and it should. Hopefully I should win the claim on this, but this is the this is the that video creators like me have to deal with. Like I don't get many. Imagine if you were doing news commentary all the time you're a channel who are doing that.

You get hit with this. You know, like I Hear about video bloggers? You get hit with this like all you know, daily or weekly or whatever. It's just unbelievable for companies to claim content and copyright on content they don't even own. Ridiculous.

Anyway, keep you updated and yeah, I'll put in the link to my original video down below and if it starts playing again and you know I've won the claim anyway. Unbelievable. Catch you next time.