Actually, there's a quick thing I wanted to mention with this video: I'm actually doing an experiment with 4k now I don't actually have a 4k resolution capable camera I'm still shot this thing and I'm shooting this now with my existing Canon Hf G30 camcorder which I shoot most of the bench footage here and it's capable of about 50 frames per second because it's the PAL Australian version it's not the international one and I shoot all my footage including this one at 50 frames per second. And for the last I don't know what? six months or something I've been uploading that high frame rate. I've been rendering my editing and rendering my videos in 50 frames per second and a lot of people out there say i love you know the 50 frames per second. It looks really great, but there's also been some people that has been saying well, if you use a particular type of browser, it forces you to watch full HD and 50 frames per second and choose a lot of extra band width, etc.

And well, ok, fair enough. Now Also, my before I stud this high frame rate video stuff I actually I Just discovered a little while back that I was actually my Sony Vegas software was actually blending frames together and that's why some of my footage wasn't probably as crisp as it could have been and I've been fixing that in for the last couple of months at least, so my video should have actually been sharp a bit. Anyway, out: YouTube actually does you know a fair bit of compression and stuff like that? so what you see on Youtube is actually not really the full quality that I'm actually shooting and rendering and exporting the video at Youtube has to lost. So what? I want to try here I've been not reading that if you take a regular HD like I shot this cat like I'm shooting this video with now and you upscale it to 4k and you render in 4k and then you upload to YouTube in 4k if you've got a 4k capable monitor which I don't so I can't I'm not able to test this myself really, but if you're watching in 4k, it provides a higher bandwidth, higher-quality download option.

So hopefully even though it's upscaled video, the quality should be better. and I think when YouTube detects that it's 4k and then down samples to produce all the other versions because I just upload the full HD In this case, I'll upload a 4k version of this particular video and then Youtube processes in the background all the different formats you know, 1080p, 720p, and 3, 4, 80, and six and 360p and all the different versions it generates those. so hopefully YouTube might actually generate a crisper and better version of my video if I upscale it to 4k. I Know it doesn't kind of make sense, but people have done comparison videos of these sort of things.

Very careful comparisons and they say they can't see the difference between a consumer quality you know, IE one that I can afford 4k camera. you know, like a while, you know, like a two-thousand-dollar 4k camera and 1080 and a regular 1080p camera like I'm my Hf G30 I'm using now. with it upscale to 4k, they can't actually see the difference when you upload and view it on. YouTube on a regular monda on regular, you know, locally on your desktop, yet you'll be able to see it.

But YouTube Because it does compression and you know that sort of stuff, it actually doesn't. It tries to save bandwidth wherever possible YouTube does. so. I've heard that doesn't Virtually no perceptible difference between a true 4k camera and an upscale 1080p.

so that's what I'm going to try today. I'm going to render this in 4k upload to YouTube and let me know if you can see the difference. So I'm doing this talking head shot now just to give some extra you know, extra different type of material rather than just the pretty much static bench material. So I danced around so let me know if you see the difference, this will be 30 frames per seconds.

If this works, then I won't upload the higher frame rate anymore because I fix the blending problem so my renders should actually be sharper than what they were. You know, six months, 9 months 12 months ago? that sort of things. So if this experiment works, I'll actually continue to shoot at key frames per second on my Canon camera and 60 frames per second on my Sony camera which I do like talking head mailbag footage with on that camera. And I'll actually render in 30 frames per second in 4k instead of full HD in 50 frames per second.

which is what I've been doing for like the last six months. So it's an experiment. And yeah, I can muck around with, you know, shooting some test footage, it uploading to Youtube, but nothing beats sort of. you know, crowdsourcing and opinion on this thing.

Catch you next time.