Investor bait at its finest.

Energy doesn't come from nowhere it comes from the car the burns fossil fuels running over it

If it can stop a 3 Ton Vehicle going 96,6kph to 0kph and also converts all the energy into electricity, it can produce 300wh per car🎉. But the biggest wind turbines produce the equivalent of over 50000 „3 Ton Cars“ in one hour…

I mean I'm too lazy to do the math this morning, but a 2500kg car lifted 100mm stores how much potential energy? Isn't that where the energy comes from in this system, the car lifting itself up onto the pad?

Look i'm not smart so correct me if i'm rong.
Einstein told us you cant create matter out of noting, so if this generates power it will come from the car losing it, meaning… it needs to burn more fuel.
EV's gona be the best thing for this, you loose battery charge hitting these speed bums so they can generate energie and sell it right back to you.

That Morgan Freeman voice has to be AI generated. The speaking cadence is weird and not at all how a real human would speak.

It's stealing energy from your's car engine!

A highspeed speed bump?!?! That's what I call innovation!!! 😂

I have to ask, why? Wouldn't be easier, more practical and actually make some sense to use solar panels as sound deflectors in highways? Theyre not being ran over by trucks, have a secondary use and being sound deflectors they probably are near some houses that could use that energy lowering transmision loses. Aside, there are some interesting studies about double sided vertical solar panels.

I have invented a much simpler system the road could be conveyer belts, eh

Ignoring inefficiencies just to stay conservative, is pretty outrageous in a case like this. To begin with, the cars are only about 30% efficient. They don't just need to expel the same amount of energy to get up to speed, they need to expel at least 3 times as much.

Could have used some more focus on the fact, that the energy is harvested entirely from the very fuel of the cars, via the forcefully increased use of the fuel, which means it's a loss from the get-go, and is going to cause a bigger CO2 discharge than it saved (not that that's a problem to begin with, of course, unless you breathe mainstream propaganda).

The main focus should be that they're literally stealing the energy, and in turn money from the drivers; they're not capturing energy that would have been wasted, they're forcing cars to spend more energy, and capturing that at an insanely low system-efficiency of about 10%.

So, this is where those voice actors who did cutscenes for PS2 games back in the 2000s all went.

Installing chained ram pumps to help pumped hydro facilities shouldn't break any laws of physics.